Access control
Owner, role, multisig, keeper, operator, and emergency permission paths.
Smart contract security audit
Web3 security auditsbefore launch or upgrade.
DappWeb reviews Solidity and EVM contracts across permissions, upgradeability, token logic, reward accounting, oracle usage, and production release risk.
For Google, LinkedIn, X, and explorer ad traffic: this page describes software security services only. It does not offer asset purchase, investment advice, trading signals, token sales, or financial products.
Audit scope matrix
What the review covers
The audit is scoped around how funds, permissions, and business logic actually move through the system. Automated checks support the review, but manual contract analysis is the core work.
Upgradeability
Proxy patterns, initializer safety, storage layout, and admin handover risk.
External calls
Reentrancy, callback behavior, token transfer assumptions, and unsafe integrations.
Oracle usage
Price source trust, stale data handling, decimals, circuit breakers, and fallback paths.
Token logic
Mint, burn, fee, blacklist, pause, supply, tax, and transfer restriction behavior.
Reward accounting
Claim rules, pool reserves, cap logic, precision loss, and state synchronization.
Launch controls
Configuration review, ownership state, role setup, and post-deploy verification checklist.
Fix verification
Patch review after remediation, with clear status on resolved and residual risks.
Process
A review path built for release pressure
The workflow keeps the project team focused on the smallest set of inputs needed to produce a useful security report and a practical fix path.
Scope review
Share the repository, target chain, deployed addresses if available, roles, and launch timeline.
Static plus manual analysis
Run automated checks, then manually review contract flows and business logic.
Risk report
Receive findings grouped by severity, affected code, impact, and recommended remediation.
Fix review
Submit patches for confirmation before launch, upgrade execution, or public release.
Deliverables
Clear outputs for founders and engineers
The report is written for action: what is wrong, why it matters, how to fix it, and what remains after remediation.
Finding list
Severity, affected contract, affected function, risk explanation, and remediation guidance.
Architecture notes
Comments on role model, upgrade path, trusted components, and operational assumptions.
Launch controls
Recommended pre-launch checks for ownership, roles, contract verification, and emergency controls.
Fix status
Post-remediation confirmation showing resolved findings and unresolved residual risk.
Request scope
Submit the contract context we need first.
- Best inputGitHub repository, deployed address, or private access path.
- Useful contextTarget chain, owner/admin roles, token logic, and launch timeline.
- Response pathWe confirm the scope and next step within 24 hours after submission.
Audit scope form
Secure intakeDo not submit private keys, seed phrases, bearer tokens, RPC credentials, or production secrets.
FAQ
Common intake questions
Can you review private repositories?
Yes. Share the preferred access method in the form. Do not paste secrets into the form.
Do you review already deployed contracts?
Yes. Include deployed addresses, proxy addresses, admin roles, and the target chain.
Is this an investment or token advisory service?
No. This page is for software security review and engineering risk analysis only.