Robot Adapter
Wrap vendor SDK, ROS2, DDS, navigation, grasping, teleoperation, and recovery capabilities behind a versioned adapter contract.
Submit Project Brief
Robotics software
DappWeb helps teams turn robot hardware into scoped, testable software workflows: vendor SDK, ROS2/DDS and business-system adapters, task orchestration, skill runtime, capability checks, factory console, WMS/MES connectors, and remote operator controls.
01
A modular software package for scoped factory inspection, light material delivery, exception photography, and remote human takeover.
Wrap vendor SDK, ROS2, DDS, navigation, grasping, teleoperation, and recovery capabilities behind a versioned adapter contract.
Turn work orders into inspectable task states with retries, operator approval, evidence, timeouts, and explicit failure reasons.
Compose site-approved skills such as patrol, read, capture, deliver, return-to-base, and handoff without exposing raw joint control to business systems.
Give supervisors task queues, robot health, evidence review, alerts, manual takeover, and audit-ready runbooks in one operator surface.
Connect scoped workflows to WMS, MES, ticketing, storage, notifications, and existing APIs with clear ownership and idempotent events.
02
Reuse the task and business layer where it is stable; keep vendor-specific motion and safety behavior explicit.
Task states, work-order IDs, inspection reports, photos, alerts, approvals, operator roles, and dashboards can be designed as business interfaces.
Each adapter maps the robot's available APIs, sensors, end effectors, firmware, site map, teleoperation, and recovery behavior to the approved capability set.
Gait, balance, force control, joint trajectories, emergency stop, and safety controls remain vendor and site-specific. They are not promised as cross-vendor features.
If a robot cannot support a requested action, the workflow returns UNSUPPORTED_CAPABILITY and routes the task for review instead of silently degrading.
03
Start with a compatibility review and advance only when the robot, site, safety owner, and acceptance evidence are ready.
Confirm robot model, SDK and firmware versions, simulator, logs, teleoperation, e-stop, sensors, site workflow, data interfaces, and support terms.
Implement one or two measurable workflows, run them in simulation and controlled site conditions, and record capability gaps and operator actions.
Harden adapters, permissions, queues, observability, deployment, data retention, rollback, acceptance tests, and handoff documentation.
Monitor failures, maintain runbooks, review vendor changes, and re-test the adapter after material SDK, firmware, site, or safety changes.
04
Model selection is an evaluation route, not a blanket production guarantee. Access, SDK version, site risk, safety ownership, and commercial terms are verified per project.
Useful for adapter development, demonstrations, and low-risk proof of concept. Industrial production suitability requires separate site validation and vendor support confirmation.
Evaluate for factory workflows when the required SDK, deployment access, safety process, support scope, and site acceptance plan are available.
Assess the available developer tooling, FSM/DDS interfaces, simulation, logs, and real-robot access for the project version before committing to a workflow.
We can review another platform when its APIs, safety interfaces, simulator or test access, spare parts, and operational ownership are documented.
05
Short answers for teams deciding whether a robot software project is ready to scope.
It includes software integration around a robot: adapter code, task workflows, skill composition, capability checks, dashboards, business-system connectors, logs, deployment, and operator handoff.
The task and business interfaces can be reusable when the workflow is defined clearly. Vendor-specific motion, sensors, end effectors, safety, and recovery still require separate adapters and validation.
No blanket promise is made. A development robot can support a demo or low-risk PoC; production use requires named-site validation, safety approval, vendor support, acceptance evidence, and an operating plan.
Send the robot model, SDK and firmware version, target site, workflow, required payload or tools, simulator access, safety and teleoperation constraints, existing WMS/MES APIs, timeline, and acceptance criteria.
06
Send the current robot and factory context; we will return an integration boundary, compatibility questions, and a proposed first milestone.
Describe the model, workflow, site, software interfaces, timeline, and evidence required for acceptance.
Review what DappWeb delivers as software engineering and what remains with the robot vendor, site safety owner, and client.